MISAKI vs AKIYAMA 12.31 YARENNOKA result is changed!! final decision is "NO CONTEST"

Fast report,
this is original press release
http://gbring.com/sokuho/news/2008_01/0122_yarennoka.htm

long and difficult content,
Please use translation site at first

I use
http://www.excite.co.jp/world/english/

I have no time,
1st report is like this,
maybe many MMA native English news site also report it

new years' eve. 『Cannot you do?New Year's Eve. 2007』It was this event and there was an announcement for one war of done Naisao Kazuo Misaki (GRABAKA) VS Akiyama (free) from the committee of ..drinking.. execution.

Hereafter, release original.

It held it in a Saitama super-arena on December 31, 2007. 『Cannot FieLDS do?New Year's Eve. 2007 Supported by M-1 GLOBAL』It drinks and I report on one war of "Kazuo Misaki × Naisao Akiyama" done in , the fifth game to everybody in the much more.

This war : from the player Akiyama side though descended at 12 seconds of 1R8 minute the Misaki player's KO win and decision. ｢In the one kicked though the kick to the face that became finish is of four points in the state of the position (ground),『Cannot you do?Official rule』There was a protest with It is likely to collide with the part and 'In the state of the point, of four points, all the attacks such as kicks of everything from the knee to the fighter at the ground position by the fighter at the stand position to the face and the head in the foot below and trampling down were assumed to be a prohibition'". This protest『Cannot you do?Official rule』It is the one that followed the rule "Submit it by sentences within two weeks after it plays a game when there is an objection in the decision" and was submitted.

Cannot this protest able to be received, and mainly done mainly the rule of Yuji Shimada director?The game image was checked as the game formation renewed, and the examination and the discussion were done repeatedly. Shimada rule director's opinion is as follows.

The opinion as the game generalization to the letter of protest from this player Akiyama is made to be expressed. Even if it is neither a foul it is nor a foul, it is possible to take it for Misaki player's kick. Because it is an act of occurring because of the flow of a series of attack, it ..".. doesn't get it ..not saying that the judgment is very difficult... However, it told it to the player and the second at the rule conference , saying that "Because this event was a rule with a prohibition act quite different from the old PRIDE rule, take care and ..doubtfulness.. Batsu was done". In such a meaning, the scarcity of the grasp of the rule on the player side is recognized. As a result, the act of going is not gotten when colliding with the rule the kick of the player who is to four point Misaki player position obviously ..no judgment... If the act cannot be connected with finish in a word, the other player continue playing a game, and the becoming it case is said by my experience value, 'Mark caring × Igor Chang Bob Chin' war done in September, 1999 seems that it is a case very near.

Therefore this time, the lack of control test is appropriate or it is a judgment of the formation of .... game.
I think that it will become a deterrent of not doing a doubtful attack to the player further more in the future. More and more..devote oneself to..improve.

I will assume the decision of the result of doing a final examination at the planning committee named receiving the opinion and this game to be "Lack of control test". However, any judgments "Finish in the flow" of the Daisuke Noguchi referee who judged this game are neither the clean one nor the one as the judgment at that time to do, and to ask disposal as a planning committee.
Moreover, it is not the one to promise the re-game to receive this because this event is not a continuous event and to be united.

I will make it to bottom-line of this game with the above.
Please do.